Publication:
Evaluating the groundwater recharge requirement and restoration in the Kanari river, India, using SWAT model

Simple item page
dc.citedby10
dc.contributor.authorTrivedi A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAwasthi M.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGautam V.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPande C.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDin N.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57210170923en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56613079200en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57687175000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57193547008en_US
dc.contributor.authorid9335429400en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:43:28Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:43:28Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIt is critical era of climate change and water resource concerns to comprehend the dynamics of water availability and sustainable management. In this context, the amount of recharge required to completely restore the water was calculated using SWAT model. The majority of river basin management programmes have been concentrated on enhancing groundwater resources, an�increasing water allocation, and an�evaluating water quality in India. There has not been a coordinated hydrologic effort for river rehabilitation. This main objective of this research was to calculate, surface runoff and recharge needs for Kanari river?s revival based on the SWAT model approach. The groundwater recharge rate and runoff were calculated using SWAT model with references of weather data. In the SWAT model, hydrologic response unit (HRU) estimated based on the slope, land use and land cover, and soil maps�etc. SWAT model splits the region into sub-basins wise and HRUs�were�estimated. Although the river basin region crated 18-HRUs based on the SWAT model, this model produced the Kanari river sub-water basin?s balance components. Out of the total amount of precipitation, surface runoff accounted for 46.2%, percolation for 26.9%, evapotranspiration for 26.9%, and deep recharge and lateral flow for 1.33%. So, 46.2% of precipitation is accounted for surface runoff. The calculated Nash?Sutcliffe coefficient of effectiveness or efficiency (NS) for the calibration period was 0.83., while the calibration period?s runoff?s coefficient of determination (R2) was determined to be 0.92256. The runoff coefficient of determination (R2) value was 0.82, while the Nash?Sutcliffe coefficient of effectiveness or efficiency (NS) for the validation period was found to be 0.71. SWAT model?s annual recharge varied from 75.27 to 379.02�mm depending on the functions selected.�The results of study area can be useful for development of groundwater resources, soil and water conservation planning in the hot region area under the climate change. ? The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10668-023-03235-8
dc.identifier.epage15092
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153206422
dc.identifier.spage15067
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85153206422&doi=10.1007%2fs10668-023-03235-8&partnerID=40&md5=339187dc9b94c324c5ce5242f9076784
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36622
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.pagecount25
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
dc.subjectIndia
dc.subjectbasin management
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjectconservation planning
dc.subjectevapotranspiration
dc.subjectgroundwater resource
dc.subjectpercolation
dc.subjectrunoff
dc.subjectsoil and water assessment tool
dc.subjectwater availability
dc.subjectwater quality
dc.titleEvaluating the groundwater recharge requirement and restoration in the Kanari river, India, using SWAT modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS