Publication:
Performance of engineering graduates as perceived by employers: Past and present

Simple item page
dc.citedby5
dc.contributor.authorBasri H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZaharim A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOmar M.Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYuzainee M.Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57192888245en_US
dc.contributor.authorid15119466900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55420424000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid42862720000en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-29T07:45:51Z
dc.date.available2023-12-29T07:45:51Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this paper is to observe the improvement of engineering graduates by comparing the employers' perception in the past and present, towards attributes owned by engineering graduates in their workplace. The data collected through face-to-face and telephone interviews with employers from Kelang Valley area of Malaysia in 2010 and from employers across sectors in various regions of Malaysia in 2006. The interviews were carried out only with high ranking officers, in this case; Head of Division or higher position to ensure accurate results. The employers responded to the level of satisfaction on each of the attributes performed by Malaysian graduates using Likert scale. The findings discovered that employers tend to rate engineering graduates better in 2010 than those in 2006. The result in 2010 indicates that there are 10 out of 13 attributes have a higher percentage of employers satisfied on the graduates' performance than to result in 2006. In 2010, the highest percentage (67.4%) of employers satisfied the performance of graduates on the ability to communicate effectively, not only with engineers but also with the community at large. However, in 2006, only 49.5% of employers satisfied the performance of graduates on this attribute. The attributes that obtained lower agreement on employers satisfaction in 2010 compared to those in 2006 are (1) ability to utilise a systems approach to design and evaluate operational performance, (2) ability to function effectively as an individual and in a group with the capacity to be a leader or manager as well as an effective team member and (3) having the knowledge of contemporary issues. � 2012 IEEE.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo6201116
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201116
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84864135848
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84864135848&doi=10.1109%2fEDUCON.2012.6201116&partnerID=40&md5=f30e96ab6df3f1ad98616a5421cca651
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30244
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleIEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON
dc.subjectattributes
dc.subjectemployers
dc.subjectengineering
dc.subjectgraduates
dc.subjectsatisfactory
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectManagers
dc.subjectattributes
dc.subjectemployers
dc.subjectEngineering graduates
dc.subjectgraduates
dc.subjectLevel of satisfaction
dc.subjectMalaysia
dc.subjectMalaysians
dc.subjectOperational performance
dc.subjectPast and present
dc.subjectsatisfactory
dc.subjectSystems approach
dc.subjectTeam members
dc.subjectEngineering education
dc.titlePerformance of engineering graduates as perceived by employers: Past and presenten_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS