Publication:
Long-term settlement prediction at closed dumping area using hyperbolic function model

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorShariffuddin A.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPauzi N.I.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHosni A.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56820235300en_US
dc.contributor.authorid26536518100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57200833894en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T06:01:38Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T06:01:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionForecasting; Land fill; Settlement of structures; Soils; Empirical model; Final settlement; Geotechnical properties; Initial rate; Long term settlement; Settlement models; Settlement rate; Waste soils; Hyperbolic functions; empirical analysis; geotechnical engineering; geotechnical property; ground settlement; landfill; numerical model; prediction; Malaysiaen_US
dc.description.abstractIn Malaysia the favored approach of disposal is landfill and most of landfill in Malaysia is still open dumping type. The soil at the dumping area are mixed with waste and soil. Thus, it was called as waste soil. Due to its heterogeneity properties, waste soil has a different settlement rate. The Hyperbolic Function model, under the empirical model was proposed to compute the settlement at a given time if the ultimate settlement of a dumping area is known. This Hyperbolic Function model is one of the settlement model that can be used for waste soil sample although further affirmation with experimental setup are needed in order to precisely predict the long-term settlement at the dumping area. The Hyperbolic Function model can capture the relationship between the ultimate settlement and time. The sample of waste soil is taken from closed dumping area in Lukut and all the geotechnical properties for the waste soil was obtained. The initial rate of settlement, ?0 is the constant. As for the ultimate settlement, Sult the height of the waste overlaying the soil that are based on monitoring and observation. And t is the time since application of load until projection time. The final settlement which was obtained in in the range as stated by Ling in which it is in between 80% - 95% of the ultimate settlement. In the first case the final settlement is 1.37m and it is about 90% of the ultimate settlement and for the second case, the final settlement is 1.76m and is about 88% of the ultimate settlement. � 2015 ejge.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.epage9921
dc.identifier.issue17
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84940933900
dc.identifier.spage9915
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84940933900&partnerID=40&md5=c0aff4d2d128e351633dc212d0c2c02b
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/22525
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.publisherE-Journal of Geotechnical Engineeringen_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleElectronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
dc.titleLong-term settlement prediction at closed dumping area using hyperbolic function modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS