Publication:
Experimental investigation and optimization of loop heat pipe performance with nanofluids

Simple item page
dc.citedby5
dc.contributor.authorHarun M.A.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGunnasegaran P.A.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSidik N.A.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBeriache M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGhaderian J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57216258694en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35778031300en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57204852231en_US
dc.contributor.authorid37118379500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55608030000en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T09:08:05Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T09:08:05Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionAlumina; Aluminum oxide; Design of experiments; Diamonds; Electronic cooling; Electronic equipment; Heat generation; Heat pipes; Heat transfer performance; Optimization; Silica; Silicon; Slip forming; Specific heat; Thermoelectric equipment; Electronic device; Experimental investigations; Line temperatures; Loop Heat Pipe; Mass concentration; Nanofluids; Thermal enhancement; Thermal Performance; Nanofluidicsen_US
dc.description.abstractHigh heat generation from electronic devices needs to cool down properly to prevent overheating. Loop heat pipe (LHP) is one of the excellent cooling devices for high heat generation of electronic devices. Nanofluid is a working fluid which has nanoparticle dispersed in based fluid. Nanofluid is proven to have better thermal performance compared with conventional fluids. In this paper, we investigate on the thermal performance of loop heat pipes using different types of nanofluids. The desired nanofluids used in this study are diamond nanofluid, aluminium oxide (Al2O3) nanofluid and silica oxide nanofluid (SiO2) with 0�3% of mass concentrations. The results showed that as the mass concentration of nanofluids increased, the thermal resistance for diamond nanofluid and Al2O3 nanofluid decreased, but SiO2 nanofluid results show the opposite trend of thermal resistance with increasing mass concentration. The lowest thermal resistance is 3.0872��C�W?1, 3.1465��C�W?1 and 3.2816��C�W?1 for diamond, Al2O3 and SiO2, respectively. Moreover, all types of nanofluids show better heat transfer performance compared with water. Diamond nanofluid also had higher heat capacity than Al2O3 nanofluid as it had a lower vapour line temperature reading. Optimization result also shows that diamond nanofluid has better thermal enhancement than Al2O3 with 1.19% of mass concentration. � 2020, Akad�miai Kiad�, Budapest, Hungary.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10973-020-09641-8
dc.identifier.epage1449
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082933062
dc.identifier.spage1435
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85082933062&doi=10.1007%2fs10973-020-09641-8&partnerID=40&md5=2f7cc35e811fd3025662e625e194053c
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/26236
dc.identifier.volume144
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleJournal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
dc.titleExperimental investigation and optimization of loop heat pipe performance with nanofluidsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS