Publication:
Realising the ASEAN power grid through unbundling: Takeaways from the Philippines� and Singapore�s experience

dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.authorAris H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJ�rgensen B.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid13608397500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid7202434812en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T08:10:24Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T08:10:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionElectric industry; Electric power transmission networks; Energy conservation; Energy policy; Energy security; Environmental technology; Power markets; Good practices; Legislative frameworks; Liberalisation; Member countries; Nordic countries; Power interconnections; Regional electricity markets; Regulatory frameworks; Electric power system interconnectionen_US
dc.description.abstractThe ASEAN Power Grid (APG) is a flagship initiative mooted in 1997 to strengthen and promote power interconnection and trade in the ASEAN region. The ultimate aim of the APG is to ensure energy security and sustainability in the region, particularly the electricity. One way to achieve this, as demonstrated by the Nordic countries, is by having a regional electricity market, on top of the physical interconnection of the grids. Thus, taking the cue from the Nordic region, a pre-requisite to the regional electricity market is the liberalisation of the electricity supply industry (ESI) of each of the ASEAN member countries. Although there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the establishment of the regional electricity market, liberalisation of the ESIs can potentially be the path for the ASEAN countries too, with the necessary modifications and localisations in place. Furthermore, ESI liberalisation or unbundling is not entirely new to the ASEAN countries. Nine out of the ten of its member countries have implemented unbundling, although the degree of implementation varies. To date, two ASEAN countries have unbundled their ESIs fully, namely Singapore and the Philippines. However, the two countries underwent different experience in liberalising their ESIs. While it was a �bumpy ride� for the Philippines, Singapore had a smoother and more orderly transition. As such, deliberation of their experience in liberalising their ESIs would provide good insights for the other ASEAN countries to consider in liberalising their ESIs, should it become the direction. This paper therefore presents a brief overview of the Philippines� and Singapore�s experience in their transformation towards liberalised ESIs with the aim to identify the good practices, the challenges as well as the lessons learnt from these transformations. Findings from the study show the importance of the governance and legislative framework to instate reform, as well as the gradual introduction of the reform moves. This is especially necessary as the lack of homogeneity and harmonisation of the regulatory framework and ESI structure of the ASEAN countries was found to be amongst the barriers towards the full realisation of the APG. � 2020 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo12169
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1755-1315/463/1/012169
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85083444085
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85083444085&doi=10.1088%2f1755-1315%2f463%2f1%2f012169&partnerID=40&md5=ee8979d824e4fd1982d4b434e71c42a6
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/25518
dc.identifier.volume463
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAll Open Access, Bronze, Green
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
dc.titleRealising the ASEAN power grid through unbundling: Takeaways from the Philippines� and Singapore�s experienceen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections