Publication:
Review of agriculture robotics: Practicality and feasibility

dc.citedby33
dc.contributor.authorHajjaj S.S.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSahari K.S.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55812832600en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57218170038en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T06:37:44Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T06:37:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionAgriculture; Computer software reusability; Cost effectiveness; Food supply; Intelligent control; Intelligent robots; Machine design; Mobile robots; Precision agriculture; Robotics; Smart sensors; Cost effective; Food security; Human population; Human robot Interaction (HRI); Operational scale; Research activities; Software sharing; Wireless connection; Human robot interactionen_US
dc.description.abstractConcerns over food security have risen sharply in recent years. The growing human population, coupled with the shrinking agriculture resources, caused many governments and international conglomerates around the world to seek new ways to improve agriculture efficiency. This has lead to increased interest, and spending, in Agriculture Robotics. In Part 1 of this work, research activities on agriculture robotics were reviewed, with many showing promising results. However, agriculture robots remain experimental and far from being implemented on large operational scales. This paper investigates the possible reasons for this phenomena, by continuing the review of agriculture robots, only this time focusing on practicality and feasibility. Upon extensive review and analysis, the authors concluded that practical agriculture robots rely not only on advances in robotics, but also on the presence of a support infrastructure. This infrastructure encompasses all services and technologies needed by agriculture robots while in operation, this include a reliable wireless connection, an effective framework for Human Robot Interaction (HRI) between robots and agriculture workers, and a framework for software sharing and re-use. Without such infrastructure being in place, agriculture robots, no matter how advanced in design they could be, would remain impractical and infeasible. However, for many organizations, the technological and monitory costs of establishing such infrastructure could be very prohibitive, which renders agriculture robots uneconomical and enviable. Therefore, the paper concludes that the key to practical agriculture robotics is to find a novel, cost-effective, and a reliable approach to develop the support infrastructure needed for agriculture robots. � 2016 IEEE.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/IRIS.2016.8066090
dc.identifier.epage198
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85050184829
dc.identifier.spage194
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85050184829&doi=10.1109%2fIRIS.2016.8066090&partnerID=40&md5=649c8fcb8d0252a5495d60c5cf2d4ee2
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/23096
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleIRIS 2016 - 2016 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors: Empowering Robots with Smart Sensors
dc.titleReview of agriculture robotics: Practicality and feasibilityen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections