Publication:
A strategy to evaluate programme level outcomes

Simple item page
dc.citedby3
dc.contributor.authorShuaib N.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnuar A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalleh H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHasan M.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid13907934500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid13609166500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid24067645400en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55057480300en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-29T07:53:46Z
dc.date.available2023-12-29T07:53:46Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractEvaluation of the attainment or achievement of Programme Outcomes (PO) is one of the essential parts in Outcome-Based Education (OBE) system. Direct and indirect assessment methods may be used in evaluating the achievement of PO. Direct assessment method normally uses data from final exams, test, quizzes, assignments or projects for the evaluation. Other methods that are used include course survey, peer review, lecturers' observation and industry survey. This paper discusses the strategy that the Mechanical Engineering Department employed to evaluate the PO for its Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering Programme. Initially the department only use direct measurement method to evaluate the programme outcomes. Upon receiving feedback from several constituencies, the department decided to revise and come up with a new strategy to evaluate the programme outcomes. In this strategy, only the courses that would contribute significantly to the PO are selected. Suitable measurement tools are identified and the attainment targets or the performance criteria are set. The relevant data is then collected, analysed and compared to the attainment target. If the target value is not attained, suggestions for improvement will be made and implemented. This method is expected to give a more reflective and accurate result while reducing the need to carry out too much data collection and analysis. � 2009 IEEE.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo5490594
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ICEED.2009.5490594
dc.identifier.epage163
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955326792
dc.identifier.spage159
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77955326792&doi=10.1109%2fICEED.2009.5490594&partnerID=40&md5=92cb2b1e24864c54d2ac6a26e6e724d1
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30812
dc.pagecount4
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitle2009 International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEED2009 - Embracing New Challenges in Engineering Education
dc.subjectAssessment strategy
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering
dc.subjectOBE
dc.subjectPO attainment
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectMeasurements
dc.subjectMechanical engineering
dc.subjectSurveys
dc.subjectTargets
dc.subjectAssessment methods
dc.subjectAssessment strategy
dc.subjectData collection
dc.subjectDirect assessment methods
dc.subjectDirect measurement method
dc.subjectIndustry surveys
dc.subjectMeasurement tools
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering Department
dc.subjectNew strategy
dc.subjectOutcome-based education
dc.subjectPeer review
dc.subjectPerformance criterion
dc.subjectTarget values
dc.subjectEngineering education
dc.titleA strategy to evaluate programme level outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS