Publication:
Combined and Substituted Use of Battery Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen in Nanogrid Configurations

Simple item page
dc.citedby0
dc.contributor.authorDahiru A.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTan C.W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLau K.Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRosmin N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorToh C.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57211084199en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35216732200en_US
dc.contributor.authorid37665178700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid36171008900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56888507100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid8690228000en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:45:01Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:45:01Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractRenewable energy systems consider energy storage against uncertainties of weather resources and customer demands. Battery energy storage dominates recent renewable energy-based system developments. Factors for the battery dominance include the extended life-cycle, high energy density and low per unit kWh cost. However, hydrogen storage had a significant drop in per kWh cost and longer periods of energy storage. Electric vehicles have a high percentage of lifespan spent parking implying low energy storage usage. This paper investigates the technoeconomics of a residential nanogrid's energy storage system configured using battery, electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cells. The Photovoltaic/Wind/Storage nanogrid configurations were optimized using nested integer linear programming with energy storage planned in combined and substituted modes for cost/capacity benefits. The nanogrid's energy costs in substituted storage were 44%, 22% and 39% in battery, electric vehicles and hydrogen storage lower than the combined storage's 0.0018 $/kWh. The substituted storages are 30%, 24% and 44% lower than the combined storage's $111,330 annualized total cost. However, hydrogen storage's 65 kW capacity is larger compared to electric vehicle's 55 kW and battery's 50 kW. Electric vehicles are envisaged to have better economic advantages under optimal load management. ? 2024 IEEE.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/APEE60256.2024.10790895
dc.identifier.epage40
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85216645623
dc.identifier.spage35
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216645623&doi=10.1109%2fAPEE60256.2024.10790895&partnerID=40&md5=8449d4bf95db4360848038866fb2a13b
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36832
dc.pagecount5
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitle2024 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Power Engineering and Energy: Empowering Advanced Power Engineering and Energy, APEE 2024
dc.subjectBattery storage
dc.subjectCosts
dc.subjectInteger programming
dc.subjectBattery storage
dc.subjectBattery-electric vehicles
dc.subjectCost of energies
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectEnergy systems
dc.subjectLevelized cost of energy
dc.subjectLevelized costs
dc.subjectNanogrids
dc.subjectNet present cost
dc.subjectRenewable energies
dc.subjectHydrogen storage
dc.titleCombined and Substituted Use of Battery Electric Vehicles and Hydrogen in Nanogrid Configurationsen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS