Publication:
Effect of Ultrasonication Duration and Temperature on the Stability and Viscosity of MXene/Water Nanofluid

dc.citedby0
dc.contributor.authorMalek N.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAb Razak N.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMasuri S.U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaidur R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTan K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJaafar C.N.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSupeni E.E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid36994735300en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59202053400en_US
dc.contributor.authorid24437439900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid6602374364en_US
dc.contributor.authorid37020505900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid23389145900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid34972072900en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:47:11Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractDespite some encouraging results that nanofluids offer to the scientific community, several challenges remain before their widespread adoption in industry. One significant challenge is the stability of nanofluids, which can lead to nanoparticle aggregation and affect viscosity. Ultrasonication is a common method used to disperse nanoparticles in base fluids. Therefore, the main aim of this work is to investigate the effect of ultrasonication duration and temperature on the stability and viscosity of MXenes (Ti3C2Tx)/water nanofluids. A nanofluid containing 0.05 wt% MXenes (Ti3C2Tx)/water was formulated by adopting three different ultrasonication durations, namely 60, 90 and 120 minutes. The Zeta potential value was used as an indicator of their stability. In conjunction with visual inspections, the stability of the samples was examined on Day 1, 7 and 30 after the nanofluids? formulation. On Day 1, optimal stability was observed in nanofluids ultrasonicated for 90 minutes at the respective temperature, with moderate Zeta potential values exceeding -30 mV. However, stability decreased over time across all cases. Extending the ultrasonication duration to 120 minutes resulted in higher nanofluid?s viscosity. The temperature variations from 20 to 60�C did not show similar trend of the stability for some cases, potentially indicating particle agglomeration with changing temperatures. Hence, more investigations were suggested to get more information of the nanofluids, such as characterization techniques using microscopy. The stability could also be improved via other methods, such as integrating surfactants, varying pH level and nanoparticles concentration, and modifying nanoparticle surfaces and base fluid. ? 2024 Malaysian Institute of Chemistry. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.55373/mjchem.v26i3.112
dc.identifier.epage126
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85197401390
dc.identifier.spage112
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85197401390&doi=10.55373%2fmjchem.v26i3.112&partnerID=40&md5=9331421255c7511e209af7498fc6754a
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/37071
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.pagecount14
dc.publisherMalaysian Institute of Chemistryen_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleMalaysian Journal of Chemistry
dc.titleEffect of Ultrasonication Duration and Temperature on the Stability and Viscosity of MXene/Water Nanofluiden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections