Publication:
Interconnecting sustainable development goals 7 and 13: the role of renewable energy innovations towards combating the climate change

Simple item page
dc.citedby16
dc.contributor.authorKamran H.W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRafiq M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbudaqa A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAmin A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57201870704en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59284896600en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57201314249en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57217247080en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:48:50Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:48:50Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis research examines the trends in environmental footprints through energy innovations, digital trade, economic freedom, and environmental regulation from the context of G7 economies. Quarterly observations from 1998-2020 have been utilized for the advanced-panel model entitled Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR). The initial findings confirm slope heterogeneity, interdependence between the cross-sectional units, stationarity properties, and panel cointegration. The results through FM-OLS, D-OLS, and FE-OLS justify that energy innovations, digital trade, and environmental regulations control ecological damages. In contrast, economic freedom and growth are causing more damage to nature, like ecological footprints (EFP). Similarly, the results through MMQR confirm that the impact of energy innovations, digital trade, and environmental regulations is accepted as a panacea to control environmental degradation in G7. However, the magnitude of the coefficient varies across different quantiles. More specifically, the findings show that the impact of energy innovations is highly significant at 0.50th quantile. In contrast, through digital trade, the impact on EFP is only significant under medium and higher order quantiles (i.e. 0.50th, 0.75th-1.0th). Contrarily, economic freedom is causing more EFP across all the quantiles, where the findings are highly significant at 0.75th quantile. Besides, a few other policy implications are also discussed. ? 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09593330.2023.2216903
dc.identifier.epage3455
dc.identifier.issue17
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163099135
dc.identifier.spage3439
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85163099135&doi=10.1080%2f09593330.2023.2216903&partnerID=40&md5=2d583bde8b3c5f8483f3e837d7905c85
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/37221
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.pagecount16
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleEnvironmental Technology (United Kingdom)
dc.subjectClimate Change
dc.subjectConservation of Natural Resources
dc.subjectRenewable Energy
dc.subjectSustainable Development
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectCommerce
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectMethod of moments
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectDigital trade
dc.subjectEcological footprint
dc.subjectEconomic freedom
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectEnergy innovation
dc.subjectEnvironmental footprints
dc.subjectG7
dc.subjectMoment quantile regression
dc.subjectQuantile regression
dc.subjectRenewable energies
dc.subjectalternative energy
dc.subjectcarbon footprint
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjectenvironmental degradation
dc.subjectinnovation
dc.subjectSustainable Development Goal
dc.subjecttrade-environment relations
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjectecological footprint
dc.subjecteconomic aspect
dc.subjectquantile regression
dc.subjectrenewable energy
dc.subjectsustainable development goal
dc.subjectenvironmental protection
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectsustainable development
dc.subjectEnvironmental regulations
dc.titleInterconnecting sustainable development goals 7 and 13: the role of renewable energy innovations towards combating the climate changeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS