Publication: Impact of hybrid and mono nanofluids on the cooling performance of lithium-ion batteries: Experimental and machine learning insights
dc.citedby | 2 | |
dc.contributor.author | Kanti P.K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yang E.S.J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wanatasanappan V.V. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sharma P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Said N.M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 57216493630 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 59329587500 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 57217224948 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 58961316700 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 57217198447 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-03T07:41:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-03T07:41:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present study investigates the preparation and application of mono and hybrid nanofluids to enhance the cooling performance of 18,650 lithium-ion batteries. Researchers dispersed Al2O3 and CuO nanoparticles in water at a volume concentration of 0.5 % to create these advanced coolants. The experimental setup evaluated battery cooling efficiency under diverse conditions, including varying coolant types, flow rates (150, 250, and 350 ml/min), and battery discharge rates (0.5 and 1C). Al2O3-CuO hybrid nanofluids exhibited superior thermal conductivity, surpassing CuO and Al2O3 mono nanofluids by 35.26 % and 29.1 %, respectively at 60 �C. Notably, the 0.5 % of Al2O3-CuO nanofluid achieved a remarkable 54.23 % reduction in lithium-ion battery cell temperature at a flow rate of 350 ml/min, compared to water alone. These findings highlight the promising potential of hybrid nanofluids as effective working fluids in thermal management systems for lithium-ion battery cells. Following the identification of the optimal nanofluid, researchers developed prediction models using machine-learning techniques. The random forest approach was employed, with linear regression serving as a baseline for comparison. The RF-based model demonstrated exceptional predictive accuracy, achieving 98.4 % accuracy compared to the LR model's 80.82 %, while maintaining minimal prediction errors. ? 2024 Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
dc.description.nature | Final | en_US |
dc.identifier.ArtNo | 113613 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.est.2024.113613 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85204049076 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85204049076&doi=10.1016%2fj.est.2024.113613&partnerID=40&md5=d00bb8e6426999b1f0b2b903685b0967 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36228 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 101 | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.sourcetitle | Journal of Energy Storage | |
dc.subject | Battery cells | |
dc.subject | Cooling performance | |
dc.subject | Discharge rates | |
dc.subject | Experimental learning | |
dc.subject | Hybrid nanofluid | |
dc.subject | Ion batteries | |
dc.subject | Lithium ions | |
dc.subject | Nanofluids | |
dc.subject | Soft-Computing | |
dc.subject | Thermal | |
dc.title | Impact of hybrid and mono nanofluids on the cooling performance of lithium-ion batteries: Experimental and machine learning insights | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |