Publication:
Comparative Hydrogen Production Routes via Steam Methane Reforming and Chemical Looping Reforming of Natural Gas as Feedstock

Simple item page
dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.authorMohd Yunus S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYusup S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohari S.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMohd Afandi N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorManap A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMohamed H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56902397100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid15078067100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59490750800en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59490333700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57200642155en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57136356100en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:41:22Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractHydrogen production is essential in the transition to sustainable energy. This study examines two hydrogen production routes, steam methane reforming (SMR) and chemical looping reforming (CLR), both using raw natural gas as feedstock. SMR, the most commonly used industrial process, involves reacting methane with steam to produce hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. In contrast, CLR uses a metal oxide as an oxygen carrier to facilitate hydrogen production without generating additional carbon dioxide. Simulations conducted using Aspen HYSYS analyzed each method?s performance and energy consumption. The results show that SMR achieved 99.98% hydrogen purity, whereas CLR produced 99.97% purity. An energy analysis revealed that CLR requires 31% less energy than SMR, likely due to the absence of low- and high-temperature water?gas shift units. Overall, the findings suggest that CLR offers substantial advantages over SMR, including lower energy consumption and the production of cleaner hydrogen, free from carbon dioxide generated during the water?gas shift process. ? 2024 by the authors.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/hydrogen5040040
dc.identifier.epage775
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85212860931
dc.identifier.spage761
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212860931&doi=10.3390%2fhydrogen5040040&partnerID=40&md5=e9b05ed178c5441d82db18b909d3025d
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36097
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.pagecount14
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleHydrogen (Switzerland)
dc.titleComparative Hydrogen Production Routes via Steam Methane Reforming and Chemical Looping Reforming of Natural Gas as Feedstocken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS