Publication:
Composites techniques optimization and finite element analysis of kenaf fiber reinforced epoxy nonwoven composite structures for renewable energy infrastructure

dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.authorOwen M.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWong L.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAchukwu E.O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRomli A.Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNazeri M.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShuib S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57203093454en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55504782500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57415901700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55157192000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59495585900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid12761472900en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:45:41Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:45:41Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIn exploring the viability of kenaf fiber-reinforced epoxy nonwoven composites (KFRECs) for renewable energy infrastructure, the optimization of their manufacturing techniques for maximum performance remains a significant research gap. This study addresses this challenge by investigating the optimization of nonwoven composites? fabrication techniques to enhance their mechanical, thermal, and microstructural robustness. Thus, an innovative vacuum double-bagging technique was compared with single-bagging and hand lay-up methods aimed at evaluating their impact on tensile and flexural strength, hardness, impact, and thermal resistance. The obtained results indicate that the vacuum single-bagging method significantly improved tensile and impact strength by 16% and 38.5%, respectively, while the vacuum double-bagging offered the greatest improvements in flexural strength and hardness, with increases of 112.6% and 15.3%, respectively, compared to the hand lay-up technique. SEM analysis confirmed the vacuum processing techniques produced well-consolidated composite structures with uniform fiber distribution, complete wettability, a good fiber-matrix interface, and a reduced void content, leading to improved material properties. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations revealed a variation in tensile stress of approximately 22.4% and a close agreement with a minimal variation of 2.1% in flexural stress, further validating these optimized techniques. The results also correlate with enhanced thermal behavior and rigidity at elevated temperatures, with the vacuum double-bagging technique exhibiting the highest thermal stability for the demanding conditions of the energy infrastructure sector. The study concludes that the choice of fabrication technique is pivotal for advancing the design, properties and performance of KFRECs, for sustainable energy structures. ? The Author(s) 2024.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/15280837241283963
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85213701126
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213701126&doi=10.1177%2f15280837241283963&partnerID=40&md5=04bbf602db6a7ef46c4687eea79392f8
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36908
dc.identifier.volume54
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleJournal of Industrial Textiles
dc.subjectBend Strength
dc.subjectFibers
dc.subjectImpact Strength
dc.subjectNonwovens
dc.subjectTechniques
dc.subjectTensile Strength
dc.subjectVacuum
dc.subjectWeaving
dc.subjectBending strength
dc.subjectBrinell Hardness
dc.subjectImpact strength
dc.subjectNonwoven fabrics
dc.subjectRockwell hardness
dc.subjectTensile strength
dc.subjectWeaving
dc.subjectComposite technique
dc.subjectEnergy infrastructures
dc.subjectFibre composites
dc.subjectFibre-reinforced epoxy
dc.subjectFinite element analyse
dc.subjectMechanical and thermal properties
dc.subjectNon-woven
dc.subjectNonwoven composites
dc.subjectNonwoven kenaf fiber composite
dc.subjectOptimisations
dc.subjectKenaf fibers
dc.titleComposites techniques optimization and finite element analysis of kenaf fiber reinforced epoxy nonwoven composite structures for renewable energy infrastructureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections