Publication:
Using transmissibility and vibration power flow methods to evaluate the effectiveness of elastomeric mounts for vibration and noise control

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorArib M.R.M.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoslan A.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIshak R.H.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIqbal I.-H.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNazirah A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAsyraf I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAzma P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56513977400en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35608147600en_US
dc.contributor.authorid23978220300en_US
dc.contributor.authorid6602271377en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56514095500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56514110500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55212663600en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-16T02:46:34Z
dc.date.available2023-05-16T02:46:34Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the results of an experimental evaluation of elastomeric mounts used to isolate vibration from a block (representing a powertrain) to a structure test rig (representing a vehicle structure). Four types of elastomeric mounts were considered, where three of them are from green material natural rubber (SMR CV60, ENR50 and DPNR) and one from petroleum based synthetic rubber (EPDM). Measurement of the dynamic stiffness and loss factor of these elastomers were initially performed. Dynamic stiffness and loss factor were measured in the axial direction for a range of frequency between 5 Hz and 150 Hz at with a dynamic amplitude of 0.2 mm (p-p). Shaker excitation using random vibration signal in the frequency range of 10 Hz to 150 Hz at constant force magnitude was applied to the block in order to quantity the effectiveness of the elastomeric mounts. Measured vibration amplitudes in the axial direction on both sides of each mount were used to calculate the transmissibility and vibration power flow. Sound radiation from a plate attached to the structure test rig was also measured to evaluate the elastomeric mounts contribution to structure-borne noise. The results from transmissibility showed that vibration was high on EPDM, particularly in the ranges 25 to 35 Hz, 60 to 80 Hz and 100 to 120 Hz. ENR50 ability to reduce or damped the amplitude at resonance was found to be the best as compared to the other elastomers. The total vibration power flow was observed to be highest on ENR50 followed by EPDM. The high transmissibility on EPDM was due to its high dynamic stiffness and low loss factor. The larger total vibration power flow on ENR50 was attributed to its high dynamic stiffness and high loss factor.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.epage545
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84922595976
dc.identifier.spage538
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84922595976&partnerID=40&md5=b6ef5adf540dd311773bb6a389202791
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/21999
dc.identifier.volume1
dc.publisherInternational Institute of Acoustics and Vibrationsen_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitle21st International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2014, ICSV 2014
dc.titleUsing transmissibility and vibration power flow methods to evaluate the effectiveness of elastomeric mounts for vibration and noise controlen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS