Publication:
Decarbonizing the Global Electricity Sector through Demand-Side Management: A Systematic Critical Review of Policy Responses [Penyahkarbonan Sektor Elektrik Global Melalui Pengurusan Sebelah Permintaan: Kajian Kritikal Sistematik Terhadap Tindak Balas Dasar]

Simple item page
dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.authorSaid F.F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBabatunde K.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNor N.G.Md.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMahmoud M.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBegum R.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid24779077900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57194161189en_US
dc.contributor.authorid14421480100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55247787300en_US
dc.contributor.authorid14007780000en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T09:40:15Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T09:40:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides an up-to-date and comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing research on long-term electricity decarbonization which is dominated by the global scenarios of Integrated Assessment Models. The aim is to synthesize and extend current understanding on the existing supply-side solutions and demand-side technological options despite the broader range of co-benefits and the latter�s lesser risk. We achieve this by adopting a two-step systematic literature review approach to analyse and review SLR datasets consisting of 103 empirical studies conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America countries in economics and environmental economics from 1994 to 2018 and published in Web of Science and Scopus indexed journals. We find that demand-side policy studies are predominantly carried out in Asia, Europe, and North America. The US contributes more than one-quarter of the studies reviewed, most of which were published after US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Three types of Demand-Side Management (DSM) are identified namely energy efficiency, energy conservation, and demand response policies. The corresponding policy instruments can be categorised into six basic categories. We further found that these instruments are not always implemented for emissions reduction. In addition, energy-saving is found to be the reason for DSM implementation. The findings suggest that demand-side solutions through policies need to be fully exploited to achieve carbon emission targets from the electricity sector or energy sector in general. � 2022 Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17576/JEM-2022-5601-06
dc.identifier.epage91
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134406191
dc.identifier.spage71
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134406191&doi=10.17576%2fJEM-2022-5601-06&partnerID=40&md5=1766b875c5b65b5b182ab20d49869e9a
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/27153
dc.identifier.volume56
dc.publisherPenerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAll Open Access, Bronze, Green
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleJurnal Ekonomi Malaysia
dc.titleDecarbonizing the Global Electricity Sector through Demand-Side Management: A Systematic Critical Review of Policy Responses [Penyahkarbonan Sektor Elektrik Global Melalui Pengurusan Sebelah Permintaan: Kajian Kritikal Sistematik Terhadap Tindak Balas Dasar]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS