Publication:
Optimizing polypropylene fiber and carbon nanotubes to reinforce concrete matrix: A response surface methodology

dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.authorAlgaifi H.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad E.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaharom S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlrshoudi F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSyamsir A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalah H.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnggraini V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57203885467en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59235906000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid8671436000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205673302en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57195320482en_US
dc.contributor.authorid58297421600en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35072537800en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:41:51Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:41:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPolypropylene fiber (PPF)-based concrete incorporating carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has garnered significant attention in recent literature. However, determining the optimal content of PPF and CNTs remains crucial. Therefore, this study employed response surface methodology (RSM) to systematically optimize the ideal content and interaction between PPF and CNTs, with the aim to achieve the highest concrete strength and impact resistance. Following the recommendation of the ACI committee 544, the drop-weight impact test procedure was refined and utilized to assess the concrete's impact resistance. The study findings revealed that concrete incorporating optimal proportions of PPF (0.3 %) and CNTs (0.1 %) exhibited significantly enhanced strength properties and impact resistance compared to the control sample. The enhancements in compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths were measured at 29 %, 75 %, and 64 %, respectively. Furthermore, the impact energy consumption at the first and failure cracks was significantly higher, i.e., 1433.82 J and 2016.32 J, respectively, compared to 89.61 J for the control concrete. Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed ribbed calcium silicate hydrate structures with CNTs, which were identified as the primary factor fortifying the stiffness and strength of the concrete matrix. This suggests that the inclusion of both CNTs and PPF holds promise for advancing the development of sustainable concrete materials with improved strength and impact resistance in the future. ? 2024 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo137388
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137388
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85199688929
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85199688929&doi=10.1016%2fj.conbuildmat.2024.137388&partnerID=40&md5=c8ab2b2940582bbfdcbcbae131cee8bc
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36302
dc.identifier.volume442
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleConstruction and Building Materials
dc.subjectCarbon nanotubes
dc.subjectConcretes
dc.subjectEnergy utilization
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectSilicate minerals
dc.subjectStiffness matrix
dc.subjectSurface properties
dc.subjectConcrete matrix
dc.subjectConcrete strength
dc.subjectControl samples
dc.subjectDrop-weight impacts
dc.subjectOptimal content
dc.subjectPolypropylene fiber
dc.subjectResponse-surface methodology
dc.subjectStrength property
dc.subjectSustainable concretes
dc.subjectTest procedures
dc.subjectPolypropylenes
dc.titleOptimizing polypropylene fiber and carbon nanotubes to reinforce concrete matrix: A response surface methodologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections