Publication:
Multi-perspectives systematic review on the applications of sentiment analysis for vaccine hesitancy

Simple item page
dc.citedby23
dc.contributor.authorAlamoodi A.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZaidan B.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Masawa M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaresh S.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNoman S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmaro I.Y.Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarfan S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed M.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZaidan A.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlbahri O.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAickelin U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThamir N.N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFadhil J.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSalahaldin A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205435311en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35070872100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57219935987en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57216158622en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57214938634en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56644806700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57213826607en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57189597579en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57763079000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35070838500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57201013684en_US
dc.contributor.authorid11339382200en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57226713718en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57221314303en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57313094100en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T09:05:22Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T09:05:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionPublic health; Social networking (online); Vaccines; Coronaviruses; Medical; Multi-perspective; Scientific discipline; Sentiment analysis; Social; Social media; Systematic Review; Technology; Vaccine hesitancy; Sentiment analysis; Human papilloma virus vaccine; measles vaccine; SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; artificial intelligence; conspiracy theory; contact examination; coronavirus disease 2019; deep learning; health promotion; human; machine learning; measles; medical technology; misinformation; natural language processing; pandemic; papillomavirus infection; population surveillance; public health message; public opinion; Review; sentiment analysis; social media; statistical analysis; systematic review; transfer of learning; vaccination; vaccination coverage; vaccine hesitancy; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Humans; SARS-CoV-2; Sentiment Analysis; Vaccination; Vaccination Hesitancyen_US
dc.description.abstractA substantial impediment to widespread Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination is vaccine hesitancy. Many researchers across scientific disciplines have presented countless studies in favor of COVID-19 vaccination, but misinformation on social media could hinder vaccination efforts and increase vaccine hesitancy. Nevertheless, studying people's perceptions on social media to understand their sentiment presents a powerful medium for researchers to identify the causes of vaccine hesitancy and therefore develop appropriate public health messages and interventions. To the best of the authors' knowledge, previous studies have presented vaccine hesitancy in specific cases or within one scientific discipline (i.e., social, medical, and technological). No previous study has presented findings via sentiment analysis for multiple scientific disciplines as follows: (1) social, (2) medical, public health, and (3) technology sciences. Therefore, this research aimed to review and analyze articles related to different vaccine hesitancy cases in the last 11 years and understand the application of sentiment analysis on the most important literature findings. Articles were systematically searched in Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, IEEEXplore, ScienceDirect, and Ovid from January 1, 2010, to July 2021. A total of 30 articles were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. These articles were formed into a taxonomy of literature, along with challenges, motivations, and recommendations for social, medical, and public health and technology sciences. Significant patterns were identified, and opportunities were promoted towards the understanding of this phenomenon. � 2021 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo104957
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104957
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85117894540
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85117894540&doi=10.1016%2fj.compbiomed.2021.104957&partnerID=40&md5=a29948bc226d2b6e7e8df8d09ca06174
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/25873
dc.identifier.volume139
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofAll Open Access, Green
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleComputers in Biology and Medicine
dc.titleMulti-perspectives systematic review on the applications of sentiment analysis for vaccine hesitancyen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS