Publication:
Mechanical and durability properties of epoxy mortar incorporating coal bottom ash as filler

dc.citedby3
dc.contributor.authorLakhiar M.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBai Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWong L.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul S.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAnggraini V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKong S.Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205323875en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55271771000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55504782500en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57934489700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35072537800en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57208875766en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T09:38:34Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T09:38:34Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionAsh handling; Ashes; Cements; Coal; Coal ash; Epoxy resins; Fillers; Mortar; Particle size; Shrinkage; Silica fume; Water absorption; Coal bottom ash; Different proportions; Epoxy; Epoxy mortar; Experimental investigations; Ground coal bottom ash; Mechanical and durability properties; Micro-fillers; Particles sizes; Property; Fly ashen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presented an experimental investigation on epoxy mortar produced using industrial wastes, namely coal bottom ash as filler to replace sand, fly ash and silica fume as micro fillers. Four parameters investigated were: (i) the epoxy resin to filler ratio, (ii) particle size of coal bottom ash, (iii) types of micro filler, and (iv) proportion of micro filler. Experiments were carried out to determine the physical properties, mechanical properties and shrinkage of epoxy mortar with different proportions of epoxy resin, filler and micro fillers. The results demonstrated that the epoxy resin to filler ratio significantly impacted the properties of epoxy mortar. Moreover, the epoxy mortar with ground coal bottom ash showed higher mechanical properties and lower water absorption and shrinkage than the epoxy mortar with coal bottom ash. Mechanical properties were improved as the content of micro fillers increased up to 20% in the epoxy mortar. The mechanical strengths of epoxy mortar with ground coal bottom ash were about 30% lower than epoxy mortar with sand at the same epoxy resin and micro filler content. However, epoxy mortar with GCBA demonstrated 50% lower shrinkage than epoxy mortar with sand. � 2021 Elsevier Ltden_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo125677
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125677
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119900086
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119900086&doi=10.1016%2fj.conbuildmat.2021.125677&partnerID=40&md5=1e421d73a062ff96806359fe80b47b6c
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/27002
dc.identifier.volume315
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleConstruction and Building Materials
dc.titleMechanical and durability properties of epoxy mortar incorporating coal bottom ash as filleren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections