Publication:
Evaluating Enterprise Architecture Frameworks for Digital Transformation in Agriculture

Simple item page
dc.citedby0
dc.contributor.authorAnbananthen K.S.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMuthaiyah S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThiyagarajan S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBalasubramaniam B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYousif Y.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMohammad S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKalid K.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid36133144000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid22941279100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59514315200en_US
dc.contributor.authorid59253514700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57190977401en_US
dc.contributor.authorid42161977800en_US
dc.contributor.authorid25922553700en_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-03T07:41:27Z
dc.date.available2025-03-03T07:41:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to identify the most suitable Enterprise Architecture (EA) framework for driving digital transformation within Malaysia's agricultural sector. The objective is to evaluate and compare four leading EA frameworks?the Zachman Framework (ZFEA), the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF), the Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF), and The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)?using eight key criteria: adaptability, scalability, ease of implementation, support for modern technologies, cost-effectiveness, compliance, traceability, and risk management. A systematic comparative analysis assessed these frameworks' effectiveness in addressing the agricultural sector's specific needs. The findings indicate that TOGAF is the most appropriate framework due to its high adaptability, scalability, and robust support for modern technologies, making it ideal for the sector's requirements. In contrast, ZFEA, though versatile, faces significant challenges in practical implementation and scalability. DoDAF?s defense-centric focus limits its applicability in agriculture, and while FEAF is adaptable, it lacks strong support for modern technological integration. This study provides novel insights and practical recommendations for policymakers and practitioners to select the most effective EA framework, thereby supporting Malaysia's agricultural sector's digital transformation and modernization. ? Authors retain all copyrights.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.28991/HEF-2024-05-04-015
dc.identifier.epage772
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85214998311
dc.identifier.spage761
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85214998311&doi=10.28991%2fHEF-2024-05-04-015&partnerID=40&md5=6c68f5294d865c02da73f37a74db79e1
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36148
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.pagecount11
dc.publisherItal Publicationen_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleJournal of Human, Earth, and Future
dc.titleEvaluating Enterprise Architecture Frameworks for Digital Transformation in Agricultureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS