Publication:
A Scientometric Review of Environmental Valuation Research with an Altmetric Pathway for the Future

Simple item page
dc.citedby3
dc.contributor.authorOlukolajo M.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOyetunji A.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAmaechi C.V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57226273923en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57192178716en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57204818354en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T03:18:44Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T03:18:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental valuation (EV) research has advanced significantly as a method of assigning value to environmental goods, many of which lack readily discernible market values. The term �environmental valuation� describes a number of methods for putting monetary values on environmental effects, particularly non-market effects. Over the years, there has been a continuous increase in the number of publications on the topic. According to searches via the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases, the phrase �environmental valuation� first occurred in 1987. The current research examines patterns in publishing rates over the previous three decades to analyse environmental valuation activity. To identify the future pathway, a research pattern was identified using Scopus, WoS, and the Altmetric Explorer. The data were postprocessed using VOSviewer to identify the mapping networksen_US
dc.description.abstractthen, Voyant Tools were used to explore the keywords. A summary of the demand for environmental valuation is also provided based on the literature review. However, the findings of this historical analysis indicate that despite the academic efforts on this subject, environmental valuation is not used in research as much as one may anticipate. In addition, the study gives a general outline of the future directions that environmental valuation research is anticipated to follow in light of the current academic research initiatives as well as academic market and policy market research efforts. The study shows that the United Kingdom (UK) showed the highest publications by location in this field. Additionally, the study shows that the choice experiment approach is preferred over the contingent valuation method, and this work illustrates this preference. It also demonstrates that only a small number of papers have had a significant influence on the researchers in this field. � 2023 by the authors.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo58
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/environments10040058
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153945436
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85153945436&doi=10.3390%2fenvironments10040058&partnerID=40&md5=157878739cffbe3e6e9d71195128b596
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/34268
dc.identifier.volume10
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAll Open Access
dc.relation.ispartofGold Open Access
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleEnvironments - MDPI
dc.subjectaltmetric
dc.subjectecosystem valuation
dc.subjectenvironmental assessment
dc.subjectenvironmental valuation
dc.subjectscientometric
dc.subjectscientometric review
dc.subjecttotal economic value
dc.subjectvaluation method
dc.titleA Scientometric Review of Environmental Valuation Research with an Altmetric Pathway for the Futureen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS