Publication:
Nanocomposite solid polymeric electrolyte of 49% poly(methyl methacrylate)-grafted natural rubber-titanium dioxide-lithium tetrafluoroborate (MG49-TiO 2-LiBF 4)

Simple item page
dc.citedby21
dc.contributor.authorLow S.P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmad A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHamzah H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRahman M.Y.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid36448840400en_US
dc.contributor.authorid16306307100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid6602504994en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55347217400en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-29T07:47:06Z
dc.date.available2023-12-29T07:47:06Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractA nanocomposite polymer electrolyte consisting of 49% poly(methyl methacrylate)-grafted natural rubber (MG49) as a polymer matrix, lithium tetrafluoroborate (LiBF 4) as a dopant salt, and titanium dioxide (TiO 2) as an inert ceramic filler was prepared by solution casting technique. The ceramic filler, TiO 2, was synthesized in situ by a sol-gel process. The ionic conductivity was investigated by alternating current impedance spectroscopy. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the structure of the electrolyte, and its morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The highest conductivity, 1.4�10 -5 S cm -1 was obtained at 30 wt.% of LiBF4 salt addition with 6 wt.% of TiO 2 filler content. Ionic conductivity was found to increase with the increase of salt concentration. The optimum value of conductivity was found at 6 wt.% of TiO 2. The XRD analysis revealed that the crystalline phase of the polymer host slightly decreased with the addition of salt and filler. The SEM analysis showed that the smoother the surface of the electrolyte, the higher its conductivity. � Springer-Verlag 2011.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10008-010-1252-0
dc.identifier.epage2618
dc.identifier.issue11/12/2023
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84855538411
dc.identifier.spage2611
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84855538411&doi=10.1007%2fs10008-010-1252-0&partnerID=40&md5=55e62e0d535589cc2ede34c562f8fb24
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30370
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.pagecount7
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleJournal of Solid State Electrochemistry
dc.subject49% poly(methyl methacrylate)-grafted natural rubber (MG49)
dc.subjectIonic conductivity
dc.subjectMorphology
dc.subjectNanocomposite polymer electrolyte (NCPE)
dc.subjectXRD
dc.subjectCeramic materials
dc.subjectEsters
dc.subjectFilled polymers
dc.subjectFillers
dc.subjectGrafting (chemical)
dc.subjectIonic conductivity
dc.subjectLithium
dc.subjectMorphology
dc.subjectNanocomposites
dc.subjectOxides
dc.subjectPolyelectrolytes
dc.subjectRubber
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectSol-gel process
dc.subjectTitanium
dc.subjectTitanium castings
dc.subjectTitanium dioxide
dc.subjectX ray diffraction
dc.subject49% poly(methyl methacrylate)-grafted natural rubber (MG49)
dc.subjectAlternating current impedance spectroscopy
dc.subjectCeramic fillers
dc.subjectCrystalline phase
dc.subjectDopant salt
dc.subjectFiller contents
dc.subjectIn-situ
dc.subjectLithium tetrafluoroborate
dc.subjectNanocomposite polymer electrolyte
dc.subjectNanocomposite polymer electrolyte (NCPE)
dc.subjectNanocomposite solids
dc.subjectOptimum value
dc.subjectSalt addition
dc.subjectSalt concentration
dc.subjectSEM analysis
dc.subjectSolution-casting technique
dc.subjectTetrafluoroborates
dc.subjectTiO
dc.subjectXRD
dc.subjectXRD analysis
dc.subjectPolymer matrix composites
dc.titleNanocomposite solid polymeric electrolyte of 49% poly(methyl methacrylate)-grafted natural rubber-titanium dioxide-lithium tetrafluoroborate (MG49-TiO 2-LiBF 4)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS