Publication: Feasibility of coal bottom ash as fine aggregate in strain-hardening cementitious composites: A study on strength, durability, and sustainability
dc.citedby | 1 | |
dc.contributor.author | Abdulkadir I. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ean L.W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wong L.S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Murali G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mohammed B.S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Amin N.A.M.B.M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jaafar R.A.H.B.R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 57218298049 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 55324334700 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 55504782500 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 57203952839 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 57203590522 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 59447297200 | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorid | 59447297300 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-03T07:41:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-03T07:41:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | The search for cost-effective and sustainable materials for strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) has led researchers to explore alternatives to silica sand, a critical yet costly and environmentally unfavorable material. Although river sand seems like a cheaper and viable alternative, its extraction is linked to severe environmental degradation. This study aims to investigate the potential of coal bottom ash (CBA) as a replacement for silica sand in SHCC, targeting to meet the minimum requirements for structural applications. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive exploration of CBA as a partial to full replacement for silica sand (at 0 %, 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 %), extending beyond the replacement limit investigated in previous studies on SHCC, and provides an extensive evaluation of the composite's fresh, mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties. Additionally, it includes a thorough assessment of the leaching potential, CO? emissions, energy consumption, and cost implications of the CBA-SHCC, which have not been fully explored in earlier CBA-SHCC research. The findings indicate that the reduction in mechanical strength was minimal (0.5 %-10 %) across all CBA replacement levels. Notably, all mixes demonstrated typical strain-hardening behavior, sustaining higher flexural loads beyond the first crack, with increased deflection capacity observed at higher CBA contents, peaking at 50 % replacement. Durability metrics, including water absorption and HCl acid attack resistance, exhibited a downward trend with higher CBA content but remained within acceptable limits up to 75 % replacement. Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure results confirmed the non-leachability of toxic elements in both the CBA and CBA-SHCC mixes. Economically and environmentally, CBA proved advantageous, resulting in 1.5?5 % lower CO2 emissions, 0.4?1.5 % lower energy consumption, and 18?84 % cost savings at 25?100 % CBA replacement. Additionally, a multicriteria analysis using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was employed, which identified 25 % as the optimal CBA content that balances fresh properties, mechanical strength, durability, environmental sustainability, and cost efficiency. The study is significant because it demonstrated that CBA can be used as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to silica sand in SHCC, with lower environmental impact while maintaining structural integrity. ? 2024 Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
dc.description.nature | Final | en_US |
dc.identifier.ArtNo | 139379 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139379 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85210543428 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85210543428&doi=10.1016%2fj.conbuildmat.2024.139379&partnerID=40&md5=4d361c60e87288a1f8a8e02a7e48d406 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/36123 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 457 | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | en_US |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.sourcetitle | Construction and Building Materials | |
dc.subject | Acid resistance | |
dc.subject | Coal ash | |
dc.subject | Strain hardening | |
dc.subject | Ash contents | |
dc.subject | Bottom ash | |
dc.subject | CO 2 emission | |
dc.subject | Coal bottom ash | |
dc.subject | Cost effective | |
dc.subject | Fine aggregates | |
dc.subject | Fresh properties | |
dc.subject | Mechanical | |
dc.subject | Property | |
dc.subject | Strain-hardening cementitious composites | |
dc.subject | Silica sand | |
dc.title | Feasibility of coal bottom ash as fine aggregate in strain-hardening cementitious composites: A study on strength, durability, and sustainability | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |