Publication:
Assessing content validity of enterprise architecture adoption questionnaire (EAAQ) among content experts

Simple item page
dc.citedby7
dc.contributor.authorAhmad N.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDrus S.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKasim H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOthman M.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205237822en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56330463900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57203863798en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205240815en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T07:26:05Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T07:26:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionSurveys; Content Validity; Content validity indices; Enterprise Architecture; Internal consistency; Measurement items; Psychometric properties; Quantitative approach; Validation process; Industrial electronicsen_US
dc.description.abstractContent validity is the process to validate the measurement items from the perspective of experts. Notably, there are lack of validated items measuring the perception of intention to adopt Enterprise Architecture (EA) in the public sector organisations. This study intended to develop and assess the content validity of measurement items for EAAQ as a survey instrument to public sector organisations. Twelve academic and industrial content experts have assessed the validity of 14 identified constructs and 52 measurement items. This study was conducted through two cycles of content validation process. The written EAAQ was distributed via email or by a meeting session with the content experts for assessing the measurement items. The analysis of content experts' consensus was examined using a quantitative approach called Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI). Of the 52 items, 50 were accepted, as the CVR's critical value that must be abided by 0.75 (N = 8) and two items were rejected. Then, the accepted items were computed to a final form using CVI. The acceptable CVI value for the final EAAQ is 0.94. Therefore, a new 50-item EAAQ was developed based on validated content and face values by the experts for public sector organisations. In future, the measurement items should be reassessed on its psychometric properties for the EAAQ reliability and internal consistency. This instrument would be useful for measuring the perception of EA adoption in organisations. � 2019 IEEE.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo8743918
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ISCAIE.2019.8743918
dc.identifier.epage165
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85069164596
dc.identifier.spage160
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85069164596&doi=10.1109%2fISCAIE.2019.8743918&partnerID=40&md5=ab8c7c6b7efb8af5b713b92b07324e38
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/24705
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleISCAIE 2019 - 2019 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics
dc.titleAssessing content validity of enterprise architecture adoption questionnaire (EAAQ) among content expertsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS