Publication:
Optimization of dry storage for spent fuel from G.A. Siwabessy nuclear research reactor

Simple item page
dc.citedby7
dc.contributor.authorRatiko R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSamudera S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHindami R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSiahaan A.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNaldi L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHapsari D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMahlia T.M.I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNasruddin N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57200398376en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57200389886en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57200396294en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205696701en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57200394513en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57200389600en_US
dc.contributor.authorid56997615100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57211141063en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T06:57:08Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T06:57:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis study proposes a method of optimizing the dry storage design for nuclear-spent fuel from the G.A. Siwabessy research reactor at National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (BATAN). After several years in a spent fuel pool storage (wet storage), nuclear spent fuel is often moved to dry storage. Some advantages of dry storage compared with wet storage are that there is no generation of liquid waste, no need for a complex and expensive purification system, less corrosion concerns and that dry storage is easier to transport if in the future the storage needs to be sent to the another repository or to the final disposal. In both wet and dry storage, the decay heat of spent fuel must be cooled to a safe temperature to prevent cracking of the spent fuel cladding from where hazardous radioactive nuclides could be released and harm humans and the environment. Three optimization scenarios including the thermal safety single-objective, the economic single-objective and the multi-objective optimizations are obtained. The optimum values of temperature and cost for three optimization scenarios are 317.8K (44.7�C) and 11638.1 US$ for the optimized single-objective thermal safety method, 337.1K (64.0�C) and 6345.2 US$ for the optimized single-objective cost method and 325.1K (52.0�C) and 8037.4 US$ for the optimized multi-objective method, respectively. � IJTech 2018.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14716/ijtech.v9i1.775
dc.identifier.epage67
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85041104913
dc.identifier.spage55
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85041104913&doi=10.14716%2fijtech.v9i1.775&partnerID=40&md5=578125c0b4294a0dd9c9ba9545307947
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/24223
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.publisherFaculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAll Open Access, Gold, Green
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Technology
dc.titleOptimization of dry storage for spent fuel from G.A. Siwabessy nuclear research reactoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS