Publication:
A review of nucleate pool-boiling heat transfer in different liquids and nanofluids

Simple item page
dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.authorZarrag K.Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIsmail F.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSann T.E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHabeeb L.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid58311391700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid58027086700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid58311004900en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205652013en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T03:17:33Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T03:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this review is to examine the current state of the art in nucleate pool boiling heat transfer in a variety of different fluids. The review is divided into many sections that discuss heat transfer in pool boiling, such as pool boiling of nanofluids, boiling behavior of water�glycerin combinations, and operational parameters. With the appropriate mixes of hydrocarbons and other commercial liquids, higher heat transfer coefficients may be produced. Coatings of nanoparticles with varying layer thicknesses applied to the heater surface may be optimized to improve heat transfer from the pool to the surrounding water. The heat transfer hypothesis elucidates the peculiarities of each pool�s boiling regime. It is also possible to expand it to flow boiling by combining pool boiling liquid motion with external mechanical force. Other phase transitions, such as condensation, solidification, and melting, can also be described using boiling heat flow processes. Pool boiling performance can be improved by making a variety of adjustments to the heating surfaces as well as by using pure liquids in the water. Improvements can be made to boiling parameters such as the heat flux, the critical heat flux, the heat transfer coefficient, bubble development and departure, and so forth. A nanoparticle addition to a pure liquid or a surface coating on a heating surface can improve heat transfer and boiling properties by increasing the surface area of the liquid. Pool boiling critical heat flux was enhanced with Al2O3-water nano fluid. Authors used three different powder sizes of Al2O3 which were 0.05, 0.3 and 1.0�?m. Addition of alumina particle in water increases the boiling heat flux. Critical heat flux (CHF) was significantly enhanced using Titania and Alumina nano particles in water as compared to pure water. Average size of nano particle used was 85�nm measured by scattering electron microscope. Enhancement in Critical heat flux is due to nano particle coating on heating surface. Characteristics of nucleate boiling are greatly affected by the operating pressure. Miniature flat heat pipe (MFHP) with evaporator having micro grooved heat transfer surface gives 50% increment in critical heat flux at atmosphere pressure whereas this value increases up to 150% at 7.4�kPa pressure. The addition of CNT (carbon nanotube) to the base liquid increases the critical heat flux. Transmission electron microscopy confirms the average size of a nanoparticle as 15�nm. Authors found that by decreasing pressure from atmosphere condition critical heat flux increases to 200% with CNT/water nano fluid as compared to deionized water. SiC-water nanofluids of 100�nm size were experimented with at volume concentrations of 0.001%, 0.001%, and 0.01%. The size of the nanoparticle was confirmed by a scattering electron microscope. Authors concluded that at 0.01% of nano particle enhances critical heat flux to 105%. � IMechE 2023.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/09576509231174692
dc.identifier.epage1641
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85161723155
dc.identifier.spage1628
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85161723155&doi=10.1177%2f09576509231174692&partnerID=40&md5=03c13a450339bd90a7b01d0328cd473a
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/33970
dc.identifier.volume237
dc.pagecount13
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy
dc.subjectcorrelations of pool boiling
dc.subjectliquid heating
dc.subjectnucleate boiling
dc.subjectPool boiling
dc.subjectAlumina
dc.subjectAluminum oxide
dc.subjectCarbon nanotubes
dc.subjectCoatings
dc.subjectHeat pipes
dc.subjectHeat transfer coefficients
dc.subjectHigh resolution transmission electron microscopy
dc.subjectLakes
dc.subjectNanofluidics
dc.subjectNanoparticles
dc.subjectNucleate boiling
dc.subjectTitanium dioxide
dc.subjectCorrelation of pool boiling
dc.subjectHeat transfer co-efficients
dc.subjectHeating surfaces
dc.subjectLiquid heating
dc.subjectNanofluids
dc.subjectNanoparti-cles
dc.subjectNucleate pool boiling heat transfers
dc.subjectPool boiling
dc.subjectPure liquids
dc.subjectHeat flux
dc.titleA review of nucleate pool-boiling heat transfer in different liquids and nanofluidsen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS