Publication:
Review study of refraction error measurement methods of human cornea

Simple item page
dc.citedby1
dc.contributor.authorNser H.Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Sharify N.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed S.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeng L.Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSee O.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAl-Sharify Z.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGhaeb N.H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid58296946400en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205364615en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57696704100en_US
dc.contributor.authorid26326032700en_US
dc.contributor.authorid16023044400en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57204908487en_US
dc.contributor.authorid26428056100en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T03:17:55Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T03:17:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to comprehensively review the refractive error measurement theories in human cornea, which is considered one of the most important theories used in biomedical engineering applications on which ophthalmology diagnostic equipment depends. The policy used in this work are the extensive reading of published manuscripts in international scientific journal and the adoption of the mechanism of accurate transmission of established scientific facts in an easy and fluent manner. In comparison, this research revealed one of the reasons for the differences in results obtained for the same patient from various diagnostic equipment, these devices base their job performance on the sort of scientific theory established by the system. So, for every measurement theory of refractive error there is a set of determinants, and these determinants directly affect the way the theory implements its requirements, and thus we get a slight spectrum of variation in the results, but it leads to similar scientific constants. Therefore, conclude that the slight discrepancy in the value of a specific variable that is measured by more than one device is a natural result of the dependence of each device that used in diagnosing refractive errors on a specific physical theory, and that one of the main factors that influence the results of the refractive error measurement obtained from different devices. � 2023 Author(s).en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo90042
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/5.0150148
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85176734464
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85176734464&doi=10.1063%2f5.0150148&partnerID=40&md5=22a2c102f36d40553e6da5e45dc7137f
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/34089
dc.identifier.volume2787
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Physics Inc.en_US
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleAIP Conference Proceedings
dc.subjectbiomedical engineering
dc.subjectcornea
dc.subjectCOVID 19
dc.subjecteye vision
dc.subjectrefractive
dc.titleReview study of refraction error measurement methods of human corneaen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS