Publication:
Preference system for guided the selection of improvement type and assessment of soil based on expert opinion with weighted system

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKurniawan T.B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorUsman F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOmar R.C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSanusi K.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57223247545en_US
dc.contributor.authorid55812540000en_US
dc.contributor.authorid35753735300en_US
dc.contributor.authorid57205235883en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T09:08:10Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T09:08:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionDisasters; Geotechnical engineering; Groundwater; Life cycle; Software design; Software testing; Engineering practices; Evaluation results; Feasible solution; Ground modification; High groundwater table; Preference systems; Software development life cycle; Testing and evaluation; Soilsen_US
dc.description.abstractThe soil in different regions has many fundamental problems, including a high groundwater table, deformation of highly compressive clays, peat, etc. Most areas of these zones are waterlogged, swampy, and characterised by weak soils, making it difficult to construct them without addressing the stability of such structures. In many cases, soil conditions and soil materials are not ideal for the proposed or planned development. In such cases, the geotechnical engineer will consider how to resolve possible issues with feasible solutions carefully. This paper presents work resulting in the development of software that is used as a tool to guide and select the type of improvement and soil assessment. It allows users to learn about soil improvement and ground modification in engineering practice while providing the user with a tool that helps to solve soil improvement problems. An expert opinion was designed and conducted to obtain the weighted matrix for evaluation selection of improvement type based on specific criteria. A Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) was followed, and in terms of design, implementation, testing and evaluation were conducted. The evaluation result based on the System Usability Scale was performed and evaluated, and it shows the proposed tool was accepted and suitable to use by the end-user. � Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.description.natureFinalen_US
dc.identifier.ArtNo12018
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012018
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85105299475
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105299475&doi=10.1088%2f1755-1315%2f708%2f1%2f012018&partnerID=40&md5=e1c00a466be7bdcf17a778bf0bdf175c
dc.identifier.urihttps://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/26244
dc.identifier.volume708
dc.publisherIOP Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofAll Open Access, Gold
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourcetitleIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
dc.titlePreference system for guided the selection of improvement type and assessment of soil based on expert opinion with weighted systemen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Collections
SCOPUS